@jmbaehman - It is polite and respectful to call someone by the moniker they prefer. I don't think it's inherently evil to use some weird new pronoun when speaking to a person who wants that pronoun used. An employer may require certain things of you in this respect, and that's okay. But when you are not under a requirement or a polite expectation, it seems sensible to use the pronoun that matches the person's chromosome pair (XY, XX).
@jmbaehman - I think if an employer requires us to do something we find morally repugnant and the employer is inflexible, it's time to find a better employer!
But using cis-gender pronouns, foolish and misleading though they may be, does not rise to the level of immorality (sin), does it? Can you point to a scripture that addresses the issue? FWIW, the one verse that comes to my mind is, "All things are lawful, but not all things are expedient" (1 Cor. 6:12).
@MichaelG if I could find one that directly discusses this issue, I probably wouldn't have posed the question haha😂 I guess your words "misleading" and "foolish" capture the reason for my hesitancy. But you bring up good points. This will likely be something I will have to continue to think and pray about. Just recently, I asked God why he seemed so silent in showing me a clear answer, and I quickly stumbled upon luke 11. I think he plans to make things clear eventually, just not right now.
@MichaelG I can see this point too. I Think in the end the question is how do i love the person best. I am not sure if rules from an employer should change how I morally act. Im inclined to say it shouldnt, but i havent thought that through. However, what it means to love someone isn't always clear cut. Jesus was painfully truthful and quick to correct at times. Granted, i dont have the wisdom to know if i should correct nor the purest intentions always at heart. Thank you for your response.