So having the vaccine is supposed to be personal, informed, choice?
I’m saying this as a registered nurse, I know the pros and cons of the vaccine. I’m not even having a vaccine pros and cons debate. BUT I’m tired of social media using their ‘powers of persuasion’ to dictate the information content we’re ‘allowed’ to be fed. How can informed choice/consent be given if the information is biased??
https://backtojerusalem.com/youtube-blocking-all-anti-vaccine-content/
@Berrybunchfamily @Lindseyay If their "information" were true, wouldn't it stand without having to silence other viewpoints? These tactics increase my suspicions rather than providing reassurance.
@Lindseyay No one needs to say anything but I thought I would share this as food for thought.
@speakthetruth @Lindseyay I'm curious what the writer is about to say following these definitions. If the idea is that the jab that's currently being "recommended" is the "mark", then I would ask how it fits with being placed on the right hand or the forehead. Other questions could be asked as well. But, I am curious as to the point the writer is about the make.
@Cherishingsparrows2020 @Lindseyay
I forgot this 2nd part. I would recon that just as with all prophecy, there is a bit of unknown that we can only speculate on but the way I see it is if it is to be in your right hand or on your forehead it could very well mean, that you are doing it or accomplices to the usage of the mark or believe the mark is ok or being completely willing to give the government what they want. FYI, I was the one who wrote and did this study back in 2016 at the age of 15. The last paragraph is the only thing I added as it makes even more sense now with that.
@Lindseyay Spot on!!